Friday, 19 May 2017

Presentation based on the Movie: ‘’All the President’s Men”



Introduction

This presentation is based on a working coherence of individual as well group work with synergy, examining the various elements by what is said to be the ‘greatest journalism movie ever made’, ‘All the Presidents Men’. The researchers set out to critically analyze the six aspects as set in the outline of the assignment and to validate the perceived assumptions on the movie.

Synopsis of the Movie

All the Presidents men is based on what is known as the Watergate scandal that happened in the early 1970’s which rocked the American administration to its foundations. Two investigative journalists, Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward of the Washington Post, uncovered a conspiracy to cover up abuses of power leading all the way to the Oval Office. The twists of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein’s investigative coup that toppled President Nixon are cleverly portrayed by Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman.

The film begins, as did the Watergate affair, with five men breaking into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) on 1 June 1972. The DNC was based in the Watergate office, hotel and residential complex in the Foggy Bottom neighborhood of Washington DC. The late Frank Wills, the real-life security guard who discovered the break-in, played himself in this movie. The story is first taken up by junior journalist Bob Woodward (Robert Redford) as a minor incident. Soon, though, it begins to bloat out in all directions. Ben Bradlee (Jason Robards), the executive editor of the Washington Post, brings the more experienced Carl Bernstein (Dustin Hoffman) on board to work with him.


1.   Elements of Interviewing

One element of interviewing that was on demonstration in the movie “All the President’s Men” was active listening which involves; not interrupting, eye contact, questions in context of the interview. Active listening can be seen in the scenes, during the interview with the book keeper, by Bernstein the journalist, he paid attention with his eyes despite the place was dim, he did not interrupt the book keeper, he asked for clarifications using contextual questions. Her information at that time and during other interviews (where Bernstein exercised the same elements of interview) was the link in finding out who was the recipient of the money that Deep Throat advise to follow up.
Taking notes was also seen as an important part of this exercise which the reporter did on pieces of paper, napkins, anything he could have found.

 2.   Dealing with sources

As we continue to examine the movie ‘All the President’s Men’, it is clear that Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein are two journalists from the Washington Post, who are tasked with investigating a story relating to the Watergate Burglary.
How they dealt with their sources was definitely plausible, since they managed to adhere to the Principles of Journalism, upholding professionalism whilst obtaining all the necessary information needed to solve their case.

Journalism’s first obligation is to the truth, you must have accurate facts to embrace your story. Both Bernstein and Woodward worked extra hard in gathering data of relevance to their story, they made sure they never accepted information as it is from one source but rather if it comes from more than one reliable source then they would try to obtain proof to back-up. This is to avoid information being untrue or hear-say. For example; when phone calls were made to find out about Mr. Howard Hunt, the journalist tried his best to have the same information from different sources by asking similar questions so as to confirm any queries he may have.

Mr. Woodward exercised persistence as he confronted his sources. Mr. Woodward noticed Mr. Markham at the court and when he approached him and asked “what’s your name?” Mr. Markham replied “I have nothing to say”. Even after this Mr. Woodward had not given up, he confronted Mr. Markham twice after, but both times receiving the same reply as his first.
Mr. Bernstein is the perfect example of the word ‘patience’, he exercised patience throughout the whole investigation when it came to his sources. For example, the visit to the bookkeeper’s sisters’ house, where she offered him coffee. He probably wasn’t that thirsty as he made it seem, but due to his desire for information from such a difficult source he put up with her to get what he wanted in return.

Both journalists cooperated to get the most out of their sources. For example, when Bernstein and Woodward wanted to find out what the ‘P’ in their evidence stand for they applied a mind tactic where they approached a source pretending to already confirm their information, and they said, “well we know the ‘P’ is for Porter….” when they really did not know, but was giving the source that they knew was aware of it, time to deny it if it was not true.

Deep throat was a major source of Mr. Woodward, he requested to remain anonymous and as a professional Journalist Mr. Woodward pledged to keep him under deep background as he insisted that he can be trusted and reassured him that whatever is spoken is safe with him. Confidentiality was practiced throughout the movie by the journalists since many persons wanted to remain anonymous even Mr. Dardis and their wishes were fulfilled.

3.   Nose for News

The story is based on real life experiences which takes into account moral choices. The movie shows how important validating facts and information are, before publishing in the media. It depicts two inexperienced reporters and rivals working for the Washington Post. Their research based during the 1972 era, when Mr. Richard Nixon was President, a burglary at the Democratic Party Headquarters in the Watergate apartment complex. With the help of a mysterious source, Deep Throat-Hal Holbrook, the two reporters made a connection between the burglars and a White House staffer.
After a brief review of the film, there were several ways the reporters nosed for news. Some of which are;

1. The use of the 5 W’s and 1 H- Who, What, Where, When, Why and How.

2. Through attentive listening during phone conversations, even while having their note pads to jot key words/terms down that fits their investigations, calling persons of interest as they acquire leads via the various sources, having face to face interactions with those suspected to be involved and by confirmation of information over the phone etc. for truth.

3. The journalists made keen observations of their person of interest actions, whether they answered the questions in a proper manner, whether they made eye contact, the amount of time taken to respond and whether or not they made excuses were all taken into account e.g. visit to the book keeper

4. Suspects body language was also observed; tapping their feet, changing positions etc.

5. Wherever information was hidden from them they sought out other avenues, e.g. the bills from the white house that were not allowed to be viewed by the public, etc.

Woodward and Bernstein begin to dig – and here we as students of journalism may marvel at how exceptionally more difficult all this investigative work was in the days before the age of technology and the internet, especially when at one point they have to go through all the hard-copy borrowing records at the Library of Congress by hand.

Finally, the reporters used their instincts to critically assess the information received from ‘Deep Throat, webbed it together to achieve the completion of their investigation.


 4.   How the state uses its power to affect people

Dubbed “the best movie of investigative journalism” ‘All the President’s Men’ indeed lives up to its name even after over 40 years has passed since its debut. Certain aspects of the movies showcases the state using its power to affect the people it was elected to govern. Just weeks after the Watergate debacle involving honorable statesmen, a committee was set up by order of President Richard Nixon, to monitor the developments of the investigation. Two top allies of the government was placed in charge to dissuade and compromise the justice system with inefficiencies.

The high point of the movie involves Woodward and Bernstein relentless digging, to uncover extensive evidence of dirty tricks and activity the tricksters call “ratfucking”: stuffing ballot boxes, planting spies in the opposition and running up fake campaign literature . The term originated within the GOP and is an American slang which stands for political sabotage or dirty tricks. These tricks were clearly used to manipulate the state towards their campaign. The conspiracy seems to suck in nearly everyone in Washington since persons flogged the courts and stayed glued to their televisions all throughout the inquiry.  

After the accusations against the Nixon administration into the Watergate burglary, The Washington Post through its investigative journalists, wrote a story indicting the President and his men. However, the Public Relations department of the White House issued a statement calling the story by the Post inaccurate. They further used their PR tactics such as ‘dumbing down the news’ to hold strong on their claim. No one from within the White House was allowed to give out any information nor communicate with the media other than those designated by the President himself. This clearly indicated the will of the Nixon administration to persuade the people of his governments’ innocence.

5.   Deep throat

Deep Throat in the movie “All the president’s Men” is the alias given to Bob Woodward’s (the journalist) informant at The Washington post.  He was known to revealed vital clues and information on Watergate; inclusive of the actions of the committee that was formed to re-elect President Nixon.
Even though Deep Throat was willing to help, he was very discrete in his methods; Bob Woodward was warned against writing him or calling via telephone, if Bob wanted to contact him he had orders to leave the red flag in the pot on his balcony and he would respond by placing a note on the 20th page of his New York Times.

Deep throat when providing information on the white house , revealed it in a very tricky and riddled like way, often just pointing the young journalist in the right direction to gather intel using terms such as ‘’follow the money’' .Bob  however, overtime, grew tired of his methods. Moreover with the belief that his life was at stake and at one of their secret meetings he shouted at Deep throat in anguish and exclaimed “I am done playing games with you”

The scenes of Deep throat and Bob showcase the dangers of doing investigative Journalism. Bob upon the encounter often met Deep Throat in a dark secluded place, late at nights. Many times while engaged in discourse Bob survey his surroundings in fright; he appeared to be jumpy as he listens to Deep Throat. On his way home he walked briskly and on entering his apartment he ran up his stares as he was fore-warned to make sure he was not followed.

6.   Journalist taking “No” for an answer

This remains one of the high marks of journalism and acts as a cushioning point to breaking news, unexpected, deep news stories; this can be coupled with the Guyanese saying that “constant banging wary way stone”. This was the fact when Bob Woodward kept calling Dahlberg who was the finance Chairman of the re-electing committee for President Nixon. It was the constant call and steady questioning (one which was done in weird hours of the night) that brought to light the $25,000 that was given to burglars (in the starting scenes of the movie), who broke into the headquarters.

Bob Woodward did not take no for an answer and also when as he questioned the lawyers in the court as to the reason for his presence and interest in the case. The lawyer told him he had a right to be there but he still went on to ask “who are you representing?” to which the lawyer answered no one but he still asked “so why you are here?” the lawyer got upset, but this was just another period where Bob Woodward did not stop asking question until he got a vital piece of information that he shared with his friends.

 Conclusion

As great as this story is, any film addict will instantly spot that parts have been borrowed from the opening scenes from the movie “Lawrence of Arabia”.

The greatness of the story lies in the ability of the Journalists to maintain confidentiality on ‘Deep Throat’ as their source. In 2005, Mark Felt, a former FBI associate director finally admitted that he was the informant ‘Deep Throat’ that helped the Journalists at the Washington Post infiltrate Nixon and allies as a part of the Watergate debacle.

Despite the twists, turns and exceptionally complex detail of the Watergate scandal, “All the President’s Men” manages to make it both comprehensible and watchable – with a few flashy fictional touches to gussy up the facts

No comments:

Post a Comment